Towards Integrating the Principlist and Casuist Approaches to Ethical Decisions via Multi-Criterial Support.

Mette Kjer Kaltoft; Jesper Bo Nielsen; Glenn Salkeld; Jack Dowie ORCID logo; (2016) Towards Integrating the Principlist and Casuist Approaches to Ethical Decisions via Multi-Criterial Support. Studies in health technology and informatics, 225. pp. 540-544. ISSN 0926-9630 DOI: 10.3233/978-1-61499-658-3-540
Copy

An interactive decision support tool based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) can help health professionals integrate the principlist (principle-based) and casuist (case-based) approaches to ethical decision making in both their training and practice. MCDA can incorporate generic ethical principles as criteria; then draw on case-based reasoning as the basis for specifying, in the individual case, the available options, the ratings of each option on each criterion, and the relative weighting of the criteria. This produces a personalised, transparent and decomposable opinion on the merits of each option, as a contribution to enhanced deliberation. As proof of concept and method an exemplar aid adds veracity and confidentiality to beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy and justice, as the criteria, with case-based reasoning supplying the necessary inputs for the decision of whether a nurse should disclose the poor prognosis of a patient to a close relative of the patient, when asked, on their first encounter.


picture_as_pdf
Towards Integrating the Principlist and Casuist Approaches to Ethical Decisions via Multi-Criterial Support.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: NC 3.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads