Early findings from the evaluation of the Integrated Care and Support Pioneers in England

Bob Erens ORCID logo; Gerald Wistow; Sandra Mounier-Jack ORCID logo; Nick Douglas; Tommaso Manacorda; Mary Alison Durand ORCID logo; Nicholas Mays ORCID logo; (2017) Early findings from the evaluation of the Integrated Care and Support Pioneers in England. Journal of Integrated Care, 25 (3). pp. 137-149. ISSN 1476-9018 DOI: 10.1108/jica-12-2016-0047
Copy

<jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>Integrating health and social care is a priority in England, although there is little evidence that previous initiatives have reduced hospital admissions or costs. In total, 25 Integrated Care Pioneers have been established to drive change “at scale and pace”. The early phases of the evaluation (April 2014-June 2016) aimed to identify their objectives, plans and activities, and to assess the extent to which they have overcome barriers to integration. In the longer term, the authors will assess whether integrated care leads to improved outcomes and quality of care and at what cost. The paper aims to discuss these issues.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Design/methodology/approach</jats:title> <jats:p>Mixed methods involving documentary analysis, qualitative interviews and an online key informant survey.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Findings</jats:title> <jats:p>Over time, there was a narrowing of the integration agenda in most Pioneers. The predominant approach was to establish community-based multi-disciplinary teams focussed on (older) people with multiple long-term conditions with extensive needs. Moving from design to delivery proved difficult, as many barriers are outside the control of local actors. There was limited evidence of service change.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Research limitations/implications</jats:title> <jats:p>Because the findings relate to the early stage of the 5+ years of the Pioneer programme (2014-2019), it is not yet possible to detect changes in services or in user experiences and outcomes.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Practical implications</jats:title> <jats:p>The persistence of many barriers to integration highlights the need for greater national support to remove them.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title content-type="abstract-subheading">Originality/value</jats:title> <jats:p>The evaluation demonstrates that implementing integrated health and social care is not a short-term process and cannot be achieved without national support in tackling persistent barriers.</jats:p> </jats:sec>


['material/summary:fileicon_binary/octet-stream' not defined]
Early findings from the evaluation_GREEN AAM.pdf
subject
Accepted Version
Available under Creative Commons: NC-ND 3.0

Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads