Inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation in the first round of the national screening programme in England.
BACKGROUND: Introduction of organised, population-based, colorectal cancer screening in the United Kingdom using the faecal occult blood test (FOBT) has the potential to reduce overall colorectal cancer mortality. However, socio-economic variation in screening participation could exacerbate existing inequalities in mortality. METHODS: This study examined FOBT uptake rates in London, England in relation to area-level socio-economic deprivation over the first 30 months of the programme during which 401 197 individuals were sent an FOBT kit. Uptake was defined as return of a completed test kit within 3 months. Area-level deprivation in each postcode sector was indexed with the Townsend Material Deprivation Index. Analyses controlled for area-level household mobility, ethnic diversity and poor health, each of which was associated with lower return rates. RESULTS: The results showed a strong socio-economic gradient in FOBT uptake, which declined from 49% in the least deprived quintile of postcodes to 38% in the middle quintile and 32% in the most deprived quintile. Variation in socio-economic deprivation between sectors accounted for 62% of the variance in return rates, with little attenuation as a result of controlling for ethnic diversity, household mobility or health status. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the need to understand the causes of socio-economic gradients in screening participation and address barriers that could otherwise increase disparities in colorectal cancer survival.
Item Type | Article |
---|---|
Keywords | colorectal cancer screening, socio-economic status, ethnicity, self-reported health, health inequality, socioeconomic differences, survival, predictors, wales, Colorectal Neoplasms, diagnosis, mortality, prevention & control, Early Detection of Cancer, England, Humans, Mass Screening, Occult Blood, Socioeconomic Factors |
ISI | 273523000011 |
Explore Further
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2790701 (OA Location)
- 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605392 (DOI)
- 19956165 (PubMed)