Domestication Alone Does Not Lead to Inequality

Michael Gurven; Monique Borgerhoff Mulder; Paul L Hooper; Hillard Kaplan; Robert Quinlan; Rebecca Sear ORCID logo; Eric Schniter; Christopher von Rueden; Samuel Bowles; Tom Hertz; +1 more... Adrian Bell; (2010) Domestication Alone Does Not Lead to Inequality. Current anthropology, 51 (1). pp. 49-64. ISSN 0011-3204 DOI: 10.1086/648587
Copy

We present empirical measures of wealth inequality and its intergenerational transmission among four horticulturalist populations.Wealth is construed broadly as embodied somatic and neural capital, including body size, fertility and cultural knowledge, material capital such as land and household wealth, and relational capital in the form of coalitional support and field labor. Wealth inequality is moderate for most forms of wealth, and intergenerational wealth transmission is low for material resources and moderate for embodied and relational wealth. Our analysis suggests that domestication alone does not transform social structure; rather, the presence of scarce, defensible resources may be required before inequality and wealth transmission patterns resemble the familiar pattern in more complex societies. Land ownership based on usufruct and low-intensity cultivation, especially in the context of other economic activities such as hunting and fishing, is associated with more egalitarian wealth distributions as found among hunter-gatherers. © 2010 by The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research. All rights reserved.

visibility_off picture_as_pdf

picture_as_pdf
7607(1).pdf
subject
Published Version
lock
Restricted to Repository staff only
copyright
Available under Copyright the publishers

Request Copy

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads