Comparison of a new, affordable flow cytometric method and the manual magnetic bead technique for CD4 T-lymphocyte counting in a northern Nigerian setting.
Godwin EImade;
BitrusBadung;
SundayPam;
OcheAgbaji;
DanielEgah;
Atiene SSagay;
Jean-LouisSankalé;
Saidi Kapiga 
;
JohnIdoko;
PhyllisKanki;
(2005)
Comparison of a new, affordable flow cytometric method and the manual magnetic bead technique for CD4 T-lymphocyte counting in a northern Nigerian setting.
Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 12 (1).
pp. 224-227.
ISSN 1071-412X
DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.12.1.224-227.2005
;
JohnIdoko;
PhyllisKanki;
(2005)
Comparison of a new, affordable flow cytometric method and the manual magnetic bead technique for CD4 T-lymphocyte counting in a northern Nigerian setting.
Clinical and diagnostic laboratory immunology, 12 (1).
pp. 224-227.
ISSN 1071-412X
DOI: 10.1128/CDLI.12.1.224-227.2005
We compared two techniques for CD4 T-lymphocyte counting: flow cytometry (Cyflow) and magnetic beads (Dynabead). Similar results with good correlation were obtained from the 40 adult blood samples counted (P=0.057, r=0.93). The Cyflow technique is more precise and cost-effective than the Dynabead method ($3 to $5 versus $12 to $22 per test, respectively), since as many as 200 samples can be measured per day.
Full text not available from this repository.
Explore Further
Read more research from the creator(s):
Find work associated with the faculties and division(s):
Find work associated with the research centre(s):
Find work from this publication:
Find other related resources:
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC540213 (OA Location)
- 10.1128/CDLI.12.1.224-227.2005 (DOI)
- 15643012 (PubMed)