A randomised controlled feasibility trial of a BabyWASH household playspace: The CAMPI study.

Sophie Budge ORCID logo; Paul Hutchings ORCID logo; AlisonParker; SeanTyrrel; Sam Norton ORCID logo; Camila Garbutt ORCID logo; Fitsume Woldemedhin ORCID logo; Mohammed YasinJemal; Mathewos Moges ORCID logo; SirajHussen; +1 more... HunachewBeyene; (2021) A randomised controlled feasibility trial of a BabyWASH household playspace: The CAMPI study. PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 15 (7). e0009514-. ISSN 1935-2727 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009514
Copy

BACKGROUND: Water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) interventions should support infant growth but trial results are inconsistent. Frequently, interventions do not consider behaviours or transmission pathways specific to age. A household playspace (HPS) is one intervention component which may block faecal-oral transmission. This study was a two-armed, parallel-group, randomised, controlled feasibility trial of a HPS in rural Ethiopia. It aimed to recommend proceeding to a definitive trial. Secondary outcomes included effects on infant health, injury prevention and women's time. METHODS: November 2019-January 2020 106 households were identified and assessed for eligibility. Recruited households (N = 100) were randomised (blinded prior to the trial start) to intervention or control (both n = 50). Outcomes included recruitment, attrition, adherence, and acceptability. Data were collected at baseline, two and four weeks. FINDINGS: Recruitment met a priori criteria (≥80%). There was no loss to follow-up, and no non-use, meeting adherence criteria (both ≤10%). Further, 48.0% (95% CI 33.7-62.6; n = 24) of households appropriately used and 56.0% (41.3-70.0; n = 28) cleaned the HPS over four weeks, partly meeting adherence criteria (≥50%). For acceptability, 41.0% (31.3-51.3; n = 41) of infants were in the HPS during random visits, failing criteria (≥50%). Further, the proportion of HPS use decreased during some activities, failing criteria (no decrease in use). A modified Barrier Analysis described good acceptability and multiple secondary benefits, including on women's time burden and infant injury prevention. INTERPRETATION: Despite failing some a priori criteria, the trial demonstrated mixed adherence and good acceptability among intervention households. A definitive trial to determine efficacy is warranted if recommended adjustments are made. FUNDING: People In Need; Czech Development Agency. TRIAL REGISTRATION: RIDIE-ID-5de0b6938afb8.


visibility_off picture_as_pdf

picture_as_pdf
Budge_etal_2021_A-randomised-controlled-feasibility-trial.pdf
subject
Published Version
lock
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under Creative Commons: 3.0

Request Copy

Explore Further

Read more research from the creator(s):

Find work associated with the faculties and division(s):

Find work from this publication: