Effectiveness of rapid SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing in supporting infection control for hospital-onset COVID-19 infection: Multicentre, prospective study.

Oliver Stirrup ORCID logo; James Blackstone ORCID logo; Fiona Mapp; Alyson MacNeil ORCID logo; Monica Panca; Alison Holmes; Nicholas Machin; Gee Yen Shin; Tabitha Mahungu; Kordo Saeed; +41 more... Tranprit Saluja; Yusri Taha; Nikunj Mahida; Cassie Pope; Anu Chawla; Maria-Teresa Cutino-Moguel; Asif Tamuri; Rachel Williams; Alistair Darby; David L Robertson ORCID logo; Flavia Flaviani ORCID logo; Eleni Nastouli; Samuel Robson; Darren Smith; Matthew Loose; Kenneth Laing; Irene Monahan; Beatrix Kele; Sam Haldenby; Ryan George; Matthew Bashton; Adam A Witney; Matthew Byott; Francesc Coll ORCID logo; Michael Chapman; Sharon J Peacock ORCID logo; COG-UK HOCI Investigators; COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) consortium; Joseph Hughes; Gaia Nebbia; David G Partridge ORCID logo; Matthew Parker; James Richard Price; Christine Peters; Sunando Roy; Luke B Snell; Thushan I de Silva; Emma Thomson ORCID logo; Paul Flowers; Andrew Copas; Judith Breuer ORCID logo; (2022) Effectiveness of rapid SARS-CoV-2 genome sequencing in supporting infection control for hospital-onset COVID-19 infection: Multicentre, prospective study. eLife, 11. e78427-. ISSN 2050-084X DOI: 10.7554/eLife.78427
Copy

BACKGROUND: Viral sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 has been used for outbreak investigation, but there is limited evidence supporting routine use for infection prevention and control (IPC) within hospital settings. METHODS: We conducted a prospective non-randomised trial of sequencing at 14 acute UK hospital trusts. Sites each had a 4-week baseline data collection period, followed by intervention periods comprising 8 weeks of 'rapid' (<48 hr) and 4 weeks of 'longer-turnaround' (5-10 days) sequencing using a sequence reporting tool (SRT). Data were collected on all hospital-onset COVID-19 infections (HOCIs; detected ≥48 hr from admission). The impact of the sequencing intervention on IPC knowledge and actions, and on the incidence of probable/definite hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 2170 HOCI cases were recorded from October 2020 to April 2021, corresponding to a period of extreme strain on the health service, with sequence reports returned for 650/1320 (49.2%) during intervention phases. We did not detect a statistically significant change in weekly incidence of HAIs in longer-turnaround (incidence rate ratio 1.60, 95% CI 0.85-3.01; p=0.14) or rapid (0.85, 0.48-1.50; p=0.54) intervention phases compared to baseline phase. However, IPC practice was changed in 7.8 and 7.4% of all HOCI cases in rapid and longer-turnaround phases, respectively, and 17.2 and 11.6% of cases where the report was returned. In a 'per-protocol' sensitivity analysis, there was an impact on IPC actions in 20.7% of HOCI cases when the SRT report was returned within 5 days. Capacity to respond effectively to insights from sequencing was breached in most sites by the volume of cases and limited resources. CONCLUSIONS: While we did not demonstrate a direct impact of sequencing on the incidence of nosocomial transmission, our results suggest that sequencing can inform IPC response to HOCIs, particularly when returned within 5 days. FUNDING: COG-UK is supported by funding from the Medical Research Council (MRC) part of UK Research & Innovation (UKRI), the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) (grant code: MC_PC_19027), and Genome Research Limited, operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT04405934.


picture_as_pdf
Stirrup_etal_2022_Effectiveness-of-rapid-sars-cov.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: 4.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads