Analysis of the potential drivers of seasonality in COVID-19 transmission dynamics in 409 locations across 26 countries 

Rachel Lowe ORCID logo; BenArmstrong; SamAbbott; SophieMeakin; KathleenO'Reilly; RosaVon Borries; RochelleSchneider; Dominic Roye ORCID logo; MasahiroHashizume; MathildePascal; +4 more... AurelioTobias; Ana Maria Vicedo-Cabrera ORCID logo; Antonio Gasparrini ORCID logo; Francesco Sera ORCID logo; (2021) Analysis of the potential drivers of seasonality in COVID-19 transmission dynamics in 409 locations across 26 countries . In: EGU General Assembly 2021. DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-egu21-8955
Copy

<jats:p>&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;More than a year since its emergence, there is conflicting evidence on the potential influence of weather conditions on SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics. We used a two-stage ecological modelling approach to estimate weather-dependent signatures in SARS-CoV-2 transmission in the early phase of the pandemic, using a dataset of 3 million COVID-19 cases reported until 31 May 2020, spanning 409 locations in 26 countries. We calculated the effective reproduction number (R&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;) over a location-specific early-phase time-window of 10-20 days, for which local transmission had been established but before non-pharmaceutical &amp;amp;#160;interventions had become established as measured by the OxCGRT Government Response Index. We calculated mean levels of meteorological factors, including temperature and humidity observed in the same time window used to calculate R&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;. &amp;amp;#160;Using a multilevel meta-regression approach, we modelled nonlinear effects of meteorological factors, &amp;amp;#160;while accounting for government interventions and socio-demographic factors. A weak non-monotonic association between temperature, absolute humidity and R&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; was identified, with a decrease in R&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of 0.087 (95% CI: 0.025; 0.148) between mean temperature of 10.2&amp;amp;#176;C (maximum) and 20&amp;amp;#176;C (minimum) and a decrease in R&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; of 0.061 (95% CI: 0.011; 0.111) between absolute humidity of 6.6 g/m3 (maximum) and 11 g/m3 (minimum). However, government interventions explained twice as much of the variation in R&amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;e&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt; compared meteorological factors. We find little evidence of meteorological conditions having influenced the early stages of local epidemics, and conclude that population behaviour and governmental intervention are more important drivers of transmission.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;</jats:p>



picture_as_pdf
EGU21-8955-print.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: 4.0

View Download

Explore Further

Read more research from the creator(s):

Find work associated with the faculties and division(s):

Find work associated with the research centre(s):

Find work from this publication: