Ventilator-associated respiratory infection in a resource-restricted setting: impact and etiology.

Vu DinhPhu; BehzadNadjm; Nguyen Hoang AnhDuy; Dao XuanCo; Nguyen Thi HoangMai; Dao TuyetTrinh; JamesCampbell; Dong PhuKhiem; Tran NgocQuang; Huynh ThiLoan; +20 more... Ha SonBinh; Quynh-DaoDinh; Duong BichThuy; Huong Nguyen PhuLan; Nguyen HongHa; Ana Bonell ORCID logo; MattiasLarsson; Hoang MinhHoan; Đang QuocTuan; HakanHanberger; Hoang Nguyen VanMinh; Lam MinhYen; NguyenVan Hao; Nguyen GiaBinh; Nguyen Van VinhChau; NguyenVan Kinh; Guy EThwaites; Heiman FWertheim; H Rogiervan Doorn; C LouiseThwaites; Ventilator-associated respiratory infection in a resource-restricted setting: impact and etiology. Journal of Intensive Care, 5 (1). 69-. ISSN 2052-0492 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-017-0266-4
Copy

BACKGROUND: Ventilator-associated respiratory infection (VARI) is a significant problem in resource-restricted intensive care units (ICUs), but differences in casemix and etiology means VARI in resource-restricted ICUs may be different from that found in resource-rich units. Data from these settings are vital to plan preventative interventions and assess their cost-effectiveness, but few are available. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study in four Vietnamese ICUs to assess the incidence and impact of VARI. Patients ≥ 16 years old and expected to be mechanically ventilated > 48 h were enrolled in the study and followed daily for 28 days following ICU admission. RESULTS: Four hundred fifty eligible patients were enrolled over 24 months, and after exclusions, 374 patients' data were analyzed. A total of 92/374 cases of VARI (21.7/1000 ventilator days) were diagnosed; 37 (9.9%) of these met ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) criteria (8.7/1000 ventilator days). Patients with any VARI, VAP, or VARI without VAP experienced increased hospital and ICU stay, ICU cost, and antibiotic use (p < 0.01 for all). This was also true for all VARI (p < 0.01 for all) with/without tetanus. There was no increased risk of in-hospital death in patients with VARI compared to those without (VAP HR 1.58, 95% CI 0.75-3.33, p = 0.23; VARI without VAP HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.14-1.17, p = 0.09). In patients with positive endotracheal aspirate cultures, most VARI was caused by Gram-negative organisms; the most frequent were Acinetobacter baumannii (32/73, 43.8%) Klebsiella pneumoniae (26/73, 35.6%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (24/73, 32.9%). 40/68 (58.8%) patients with positive cultures for these had carbapenem-resistant isolates. Patients with carbapenem-resistant VARI had significantly greater ICU costs than patients with carbapenem-susceptible isolates (6053 USD (IQR 3806-7824) vs 3131 USD (IQR 2108-7551), p = 0.04) and after correction for adequacy of initial antibiotics and APACHE II score, showed a trend towards increased risk of in-hospital death (HR 2.82, 95% CI 0.75-6.75, p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: VARI in a resource-restricted setting has limited impact on mortality, but shows significant association with increased patient costs, length of stay, and antibiotic use, particularly when caused by carbapenem-resistant bacteria. Evidence-based interventions to reduce VARI in these settings are urgently needed.



picture_as_pdf
Phu_etal_2017_Ventilator-associated-respiratory-infection.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: 4.0

View Download

Explore Further

Read more research from the creator(s):

Find work associated with the faculties and division(s):

Find work from this publication: