The International Sexual Health And REproductive Health during COVID-19 (I-SHARE) Study: A Multicountry Analysis of Adults from 30 Countries Prior to and During the Initial Coronavirus Disease 2019 Wave.

Jennifer Toller Erausquin ORCID logo; Rayner KJ Tan; Maximiliane Uhlich; Joel M Francis; Navin Kumar; Linda Campbell; Wei Hong Zhang; Takhona G Hlatshwako; Priya Kosana; Sonam Shah; +28 more... Erica M Brenner; Lore Remmerie; Aamirah Mussa; Katerina Klapilova; Kristen Mark; Gabriela Perotta; Amanda Gabster; Edwin Wouters; Sharyn Burns; Jacqueline Hendriks; Devon J Hensel; Simukai Shamu; Jenna Marie Strizzi; Tammary Esho; Chelsea Morroni; Stefano Eleuteri; Norhafiza Sahril; Wah Yun Low; Leona Plasilova; Gunta Lazdane; Michael Marks ORCID logo; Adesola Olumide; Amr Abdelhamed; Alejandra López Gómez; Kristien Michielsen; Caroline Moreau; Joseph D Tucker ORCID logo; International Sexual Health And REproductive Health during COVID; (2022) The International Sexual Health And REproductive Health during COVID-19 (I-SHARE) Study: A Multicountry Analysis of Adults from 30 Countries Prior to and During the Initial Coronavirus Disease 2019 Wave. Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 75 (1). e991-e999. ISSN 1058-4838 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciac102
Copy

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence to date about changes to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) during the initial wave of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To address this gap, our team organized a multicountry, cross-sectional online survey as part of a global consortium. METHODS: Consortium research teams conducted online surveys in 30 countries. Sampling methods included convenience, online panels, and population-representative. Primary outcomes included sexual behaviors, partner violence, and SRH service use, and we compared 3 months prior to and during policy measures to mitigate COVID-19. We conducted meta-analyses for primary outcomes and graded the certainty of the evidence. RESULTS: Among 4546 respondents with casual partners, condom use stayed the same for 3374 (74.4%), and 640 (14.1%) reported a decline. Fewer respondents reported physical or sexual partner violence during COVID-19 measures (1063 of 15 144, 7.0%) compared to before COVID-19 measures (1469 of 15 887, 9.3%). COVID-19 measures impeded access to condoms (933 of 10 790, 8.7%), contraceptives (610 of 8175, 7.5%), and human immunodeficiency virus/sexually transmitted infection (HIV/STI) testing (750 of 1965, 30.7%). Pooled estimates from meta-analysis indicate that during COVID-19 measures, 32.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23.9%-42.1%) of people needing HIV/STI testing had hindered access, 4.4% (95% CI, 3.4%-5.4%) experienced partner violence, and 5.8% (95% CI, 5.4%-8.2%) decreased casual partner condom use (moderate certainty of evidence for each outcome). Meta-analysis findings were robust in sensitivity analyses that examined country income level, sample size, and sampling strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Open science methods are feasible to organize research studies as part of emergency responses. The initial COVID-19 wave impacted SRH behaviors and access to services across diverse global settings.


picture_as_pdf
ciac102.pdf
subject
Accepted Version
Available under Creative Commons: NC-ND 4.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads