Epidemiological versus meteorological forecasts: Best practice for linking models to policymaking

Erin Coughlan de Perez ORCID logo; ElisabethStephens; Maarten van Aalst ORCID logo; JuanBazo; Eleonore Fournier-Tombs ORCID logo; Sebastian Funk ORCID logo; Jeremy J Hess ORCID logo; NicolaRanger; Rachel Lowe ORCID logo; (2021) Epidemiological versus meteorological forecasts: Best practice for linking models to policymaking. International Journal of Forecasting, 38 (2). pp. 521-526. ISSN 0169-2070 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.08.003
Copy

Weather forecasts, climate change projections, and epidemiological predictions all represent domains that are using forecast data to take early action for risk management. However, the methods and applications of the modeling efforts in each of these three fields have been developed and applied with little cross-fertilization. This perspective identifies best practices in each domain that can be adopted by the others, which can be used to inform each field separately as well as to facilitate a more effective combined use for the management of compound and evolving risks. In light of increased attention to predictive modeling during the COVID-19 pandemic, we identify three major areas that all three of these modeling fields should prioritize for future investment and improvement: (1) decision support, (2) conveying uncertainty, and (3) capturing vulnerability.



picture_as_pdf
epidimiological vs meterological forecasts and risk assesments.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: NC-ND 4.0

View Download

Explore Further

Read more research from the creator(s):

Find work associated with the faculties and division(s):

Find work associated with the research centre(s):

Find work from this publication: