Modelling the effect of infection prevention and control measures on rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission to clinic attendees in primary health clinics in South Africa.

Nicky McCreesh ORCID logo; Aaron S Karat ORCID logo; Kathy Baisley ORCID logo; KarinDiaconu; Fiammetta Bozzani ORCID logo; Indira Govender ORCID logo; PeterBeckwith; Tom AYates; Arminder KDeol; Rein MGJ Houben ORCID logo; +3 more... Karina Kielmann ORCID logo; Richard G White ORCID logo; Alison D Grant ORCID logo; (2021) Modelling the effect of infection prevention and control measures on rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis transmission to clinic attendees in primary health clinics in South Africa. BMJ global health, 6 (10). e007124-e007124. ISSN 2059-7908 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007124
Copy

BACKGROUND: Elevated rates of tuberculosis in healthcare workers demonstrate the high rate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) transmission in health facilities in high-burden settings. In the context of a project taking a whole systems approach to tuberculosis infection prevention and control (IPC), we aimed to evaluate the potential impact of conventional and novel IPC measures on Mtb transmission to patients and other clinic attendees. METHODS: An individual-based model of patient movements through clinics, ventilation in waiting areas, and Mtb transmission was developed, and parameterised using empirical data from eight clinics in two provinces in South Africa. Seven interventions-codeveloped with health professionals and policy-makers-were simulated: (1) queue management systems with outdoor waiting areas, (2) ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) systems, (3) appointment systems, (4) opening windows and doors, (5) surgical mask wearing by clinic attendees, (6) simple clinic retrofits and (7) increased coverage of long antiretroviral therapy prescriptions and community medicine collection points through the Central Chronic Medicine Dispensing and Distribution (CCMDD) service. RESULTS: In the model, (1) outdoor waiting areas reduced the transmission to clinic attendees by 83% (IQR 76%-88%), (2) UVGI by 77% (IQR 64%-85%), (3) appointment systems by 62% (IQR 45%-75%), (4) opening windows and doors by 55% (IQR 25%-72%), (5) masks by 47% (IQR 42%-50%), (6) clinic retrofits by 45% (IQR 16%-64%) and (7) increasing the coverage of CCMDD by 22% (IQR 12%-32%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the interventions achieved median reductions in the rate of transmission to clinic attendees of at least 45%, meaning that a range of highly effective intervention options are available, that can be tailored to the local context. Measures that are not traditionally considered to be IPC interventions, such as appointment systems, may be as effective as more traditional IPC measures, such as mask wearing.



picture_as_pdf
e007124.full.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: 4.0

View Download

Explore Further

Read more research from the creator(s):

Find work associated with the faculties and division(s):

Find work associated with the research centre(s):

Find work from this publication: