Amphilimus- vs. zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: the SUGAR trial.

Rafael Romaguera ORCID logo; Pablo Salinas ORCID logo; Josep Gomez-Lara ORCID logo; Salvatore Brugaletta; Antonio Gómez-Menchero; Miguel A Romero; Sergio García-Blas; Raymundo Ocaranza; Pascual Bordes; Marcelo Jiménez Kockar; +23 more... Neus Salvatella; Victor A Jiménez-Díaz; Mar Alameda; Ramiro Trillo ORCID logo; Dae Hyun Lee; Pedro Martín ORCID logo; María López-Benito; Alfonso Freites; Virginia Pascual-Tejerina; Felipe Hernández-Hernández; Bruno García Del Blanco; Mohsen Mohandes; Francisco Bosa; Eduardo Pinar; Gerard Roura ORCID logo; Josep Comin-Colet ORCID logo; Antonio Fernández-Ortiz; Carlos Macaya; Xavier Rossello ORCID logo; Manel Sabate ORCID logo; Stuart J Pocock; Joan A Gómez-Hospital ORCID logo; SUGAR trial investigators; SUGAR trial Investigators; (2021) Amphilimus- vs. zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: the SUGAR trial. Eur Heart J, 43 (13). pp. 1320-1330. ISSN 0195-668X DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab790
Copy

AIM: Patients with diabetes mellitus are at high risk of adverse events after percutaneous revascularization, with no differences in outcomes between most contemporary drug-eluting stents. The Cre8 EVO stent releases a formulation of sirolimus with an amphiphilic carrier from laser-dug wells, and has shown clinical benefits in diabetes. We aimed to compare Cre8 EVO stents to Resolute Onyx stents (a contemporary polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent) in patients with diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS: We did an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial at 23 sites in Spain. Eligible patients had diabetes and required percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 1175 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Cre8 EVO or Resolute Onyx stents. The primary endpoint was target-lesion failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. The trial had a non-inferiority design with a 4% margin for the primary endpoint. A superiority analysis was planned if non-inferiority was confirmed. There were 106 primary events, 42 (7.2%) in the Cre8 EVO group and 64 (10.9%) in the Resolute Onyx group [hazard ratio (HR): 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-0.96; Pnon-inferiority < 0.001; Psuperiority = 0.030]. Among the secondary endpoints, Cre8 EVO stents had significantly lower rate than Resolute Onyx stents of target-vessel failure (7.5% vs. 11.1%, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46-0.99; P = 0.042). Probable or definite stent thrombosis and all-cause death were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with diabetes, Cre8 EVO stents were non-inferior to Resolute Onyx stents with regard to target-lesion failure composite outcome. An exploratory analysis for superiority at 1 year suggests that the Cre8 EVO stents might be superior to Resolute Onyx stents with regard to the same outcome. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03321032.


picture_as_pdf
ehab790.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: 3.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads