Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size.

Megan D Barnes ORCID logo; Ian D Craigie; Luke B Harrison; Jonas Geldmann; Ben Collen; Sarah Whitmee ORCID logo; Andrew Balmford; Neil D Burgess; Thomas Brooks; Marc Hockings; +1 more... Stephen Woodley; (2016) Wildlife population trends in protected areas predicted by national socio-economic metrics and body size. Nature Communications, 7 (1). 12747-. ISSN 2041-1723 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms12747
Copy

Ensuring that protected areas (PAs) maintain the biodiversity within their boundaries is fundamental in achieving global conservation goals. Despite this objective, wildlife abundance changes in PAs are patchily documented and poorly understood. Here, we use linear mixed effect models to explore correlates of population change in 1,902 populations of birds and mammals from 447 PAs globally. On an average, we find PAs are maintaining populations of monitored birds and mammals within their boundaries. Wildlife population trends are more positive in PAs located in countries with higher development scores, and for larger-bodied species. These results suggest that active management can consistently overcome disadvantages of lower reproductive rates and more severe threats experienced by larger species of birds and mammals. The link between wildlife trends and national development shows that the social and economic conditions supporting PAs are critical for the successful maintenance of their wildlife populations.


picture_as_pdf
Barnes_etal_2016_Wildlife-population-trends-in-protected.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: 3.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads