Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant.

Shabir A Madhi; Vicky Baillie; Clare L Cutland; Merryn Voysey; Anthonet L Koen; Lee Fairlie; Sherman D Padayachee; Keertan Dheda ORCID logo; Shaun L Barnabas; Qasim E Bhorat; +43 more... Carmen Briner; Gaurav Kwatra; Khatija Ahmed; Parvinder Aley; Sutika Bhikha; Jinal N Bhiman; As'ad E Bhorat; Jeanine du Plessis; Aliasgar Esmail; Marisa Groenewald; Elizea Horne; Shi-Hsia Hwa; Aylin Jose; Teresa Lambe; Matt Laubscher; Mookho Malahleha; Masebole Masenya; Mduduzi Masilela; Shakeel McKenzie; Kgaogelo Molapo; Andrew Moultrie ORCID logo; Suzette Oelofse; Faeezah Patel; Sureshnee Pillay; Sarah Rhead; Hylton Rodel; Lindie Rossouw; Carol Taoushanis; Houriiyah Tegally ORCID logo; Asha Thombrayil; Samuel van Eck; Constantinos K Wibmer; Nicholas M Durham; Elizabeth J Kelly; Tonya L Villafana; Sarah Gilbert; Andrew J Pollard; Tulio de Oliveira; Penny L Moore; Alex Sigal; Alane Izu; NGS-SA Group; Wits-VIDA COVID Group; (2021) Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.351 Variant. The New England journal of medicine, 384 (20). pp. 1885-1898. ISSN 0028-4793 DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2102214
Copy

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the safety and efficacy of vaccines against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in different populations is essential, as is investigation of the efficacy of the vaccines against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, including the B.1.351 (501Y.V2) variant first identified in South Africa. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) in people not infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in South Africa. Participants 18 to less than 65 years of age were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses of vaccine containing 5×1010 viral particles or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride solution) 21 to 35 days apart. Serum samples obtained from 25 participants after the second dose were tested by pseudovirus and live-virus neutralization assays against the original D614G virus and the B.1.351 variant. The primary end points were safety and efficacy of the vaccine against laboratory-confirmed symptomatic coronavirus 2019 illness (Covid-19) more than 14 days after the second dose. RESULTS: Between June 24 and November 9, 2020, we enrolled 2026 HIV-negative adults (median age, 30 years); 1010 and 1011 participants received at least one dose of placebo or vaccine, respectively. Both the pseudovirus and the live-virus neutralization assays showed greater resistance to the B.1.351 variant in serum samples obtained from vaccine recipients than in samples from placebo recipients. In the primary end-point analysis, mild-to-moderate Covid-19 developed in 23 of 717 placebo recipients (3.2%) and in 19 of 750 vaccine recipients (2.5%), for an efficacy of 21.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], -49.9 to 59.8). Among the 42 participants with Covid-19, 39 cases (95.1% of 41 with sequencing data) were caused by the B.1.351 variant; vaccine efficacy against this variant, analyzed as a secondary end point, was 10.4% (95% CI, -76.8 to 54.8). The incidence of serious adverse events was balanced between the vaccine and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: A two-dose regimen of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine did not show protection against mild-to-moderate Covid-19 due to the B.1.351 variant. (Funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04444674; Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number, PACTR202006922165132).


picture_as_pdf
Madhi_etal_2020-Efficacy-of-the-ChAdOx1-nCoV-19.pdf
subject
Published Version
copyright
Available under Copyright the publishers

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads