Sex, gender, and retinoblastoma: analysis of 4351 patients from 153 countries.

Ido Didi Fabian ORCID logo; VikasKhetan; Andrew WStacey; Allen Foster; Dupe SAdemola-Popoola; Jesse LBerry; NathalieCassoux; Guillermo L Chantada ORCID logo; LailaHessissen; Swathi Kaliki ORCID logo; +17 more... Tero T Kivelä ORCID logo; SandraLuna-Fineman; Francis LMunier; M AshwinReddy; DuangnateRojanaporn; SharonBlum; Sadik TSherief; Sandra E Staffieri ORCID logo; TuyisabeTheophile; KeithWaddell; XundaJi; Nicholas J Astbury ORCID logo; Covadonga Bascaran ORCID logo; Matthew Burton ORCID logo; Marcia Zondervan ORCID logo; Richard Bowman ORCID logo; Global Retinoblastoma Study Group; Global Retinoblastoma Study Group; (2021) Sex, gender, and retinoblastoma: analysis of 4351 patients from 153 countries. Eye (London, England), 36 (8). pp. 1571-1577. ISSN 0950-222X DOI: 10.1038/s41433-021-01675-y
Copy

OBJECTIVE: To investigate in a large global sample of patients with retinoblastoma whether sex predilection exists for this childhood eye cancer. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis including 4351 treatment-naive retinoblastoma patients from 153 countries who presented to 278 treatment centers across the world in 2017. The sex ratio (male/female) in the sample was compared to the sex ratio at birth by means of a two-sided proportions test at global level, country economic grouping, continent, and for selected countries. RESULTS: For the entire sample, the mean retinoblastoma sex ratio, 1.20, was higher than the weighted global sex ratio at birth, 1.07 (p < 0.001). Analysis at economic grouping, continent, and country-level demonstrated differences in the sex ratio in the sample compared to the ratio at birth in lower-middle-income countries (n = 1940), 1.23 vs. 1.07 (p = 0.019); Asia (n = 2276), 1.28 vs. 1.06 (p < 0.001); and India (n = 558), 1.52 vs. 1.11 (p = 0.008). Sensitivity analysis, excluding data from India, showed that differences remained significant for the remaining sample (χ2 = 6.925, corrected p = 0.025) and for Asia (χ2 = 5.084, corrected p = 0.036). Excluding data from Asia, differences for the remaining sample were nonsignificant (χ2 = 2.205, p = 0.14). CONCLUSIONS: No proof of sex predilection in retinoblastoma was found in the present study, which is estimated to include over half of new retinoblastoma patients worldwide in 2017. A high male to female ratio in Asian countries, India in specific, which may have had an impact on global-level analysis, is likely due to gender discrimination in access to care in these countries, rather than a biological difference between sexes.



picture_as_pdf
s41433-021-01675-y.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: 3.0

View Download

Explore Further

Read more research from the creator(s):

Find work associated with the faculties and division(s):

Find work associated with the research centre(s):

Find work from this publication: