Models of COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation: a systematic literature search and narrative review

Nuru Saadi ORCID logo; Y-LingChi; SrobanaGhosh; Rosalind M Eggo ORCID logo; Ciara McCarthy ORCID logo; Matthew Quaife ORCID logo; Jeanette Dawa ORCID logo; Mark Jit ORCID logo; Anna Vassall ORCID logo; (2021) Models of COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation: a systematic literature search and narrative review. medRxiv. DOI: 10.1101/2021.06.21.21259104
Copy

<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>How best to prioritise COVID-19 vaccination within and between countries has been a public health and an ethical challenge for decision-makers globally. We systematically reviewed epidemiological and economic modelling evidence on population priority groups to minimise COVID-19 mortality, transmission and morbidity outcomes.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>We searched the National Institute of Health iSearch COVID-19 Portfolio (a database of peer-reviewed and pre-print articles), Econlit, the Centre for Economic Policy Research and the National Bureau of Economic Research for mathematical modelling studies evaluating the impact of prioritising COVID-19 vaccination to population target groups. We narratively synthesised the main study conclusions on prioritisation and the conditions under which the conclusions changed.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Findings</jats:title><jats:p>The search identified 1820 studies. 36 studies met the inclusion criteria and were narratively synthesised. 83% of studies described outcomes in high-income countries. We found that for countries seeking to minimise deaths, prioritising vaccination of senior adults was the optimal strategy and for countries seeking to minimise cases the young were prioritised. There were several exceptions to the main conclusion, notably reductions in deaths could be increased, if groups at high risk of both transmission and death could be further identified. Findings were also sensitive to the level of vaccine coverage.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Interpretation</jats:title><jats:p>The evidence supports WHO SAGE recommendations on COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation. There is however an evidence gap on optimal prioritisation for low- and middle-income countries, studies that included an economic evaluation, and studies that explore prioritisation strategies if the aim is to reduce overall health burden including morbidity.</jats:p></jats:sec>



picture_as_pdf
Models of COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation- a systematic literature search and narrative review medrxiv.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: NC-ND 3.0

View Download

Explore Further

Read more research from the creator(s):

Find work associated with the faculties and division(s):

Find work associated with the research centre(s):

Find work from this publication: