Pragmatic economic evaluation of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing in Malawi.

Pitchaya P Indravudh ORCID logo; Katherine Fielding ORCID logo; Linda A Sande ORCID logo; HendramoorthyMaheswaran; SaviourMphande; Moses KKumwenda; RichardChilongosi; RoseNyirenda; Cheryl C Johnson ORCID logo; KarinHatzold; +2 more... Elizabeth L Corbett ORCID logo; Fern Terris-Prestholt ORCID logo; (2021) Pragmatic economic evaluation of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing in Malawi. BMJ global health, 6 (Suppl ). e004593-e004593. ISSN 2059-7908 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004593
Copy

INTRODUCTION: Community-based strategies can extend coverage of HIV testing and diagnose HIV at earlier stages of infection but can be costly to implement. We evaluated the costs and effects of community-led delivery of HIV self-testing (HIVST) in Mangochi District, Malawi. METHODS: This economic evaluation was based within a pragmatic cluster-randomised trial of 30 group village heads and their catchment areas comparing the community-led HIVST intervention in addition to the standard of care (SOC) versus the SOC alone. The intervention involved mobilising community health groups to lead 7-day HIVST campaigns including distribution of HIVST kits. The SOC included facility-based HIV testing services. Primary costings estimated economic costs of the intervention and SOC from the provider perspective, with costs annualised and measured in 2018 US$. A postintervention survey captured individual-level data on HIV testing events, which were combined with unit costs from primary costings, and outcomes. The incremental cost per person tested HIV-positive and associated uncertainty were estimated. RESULTS: Overall, the community-led HIVST intervention costed $138 624 or $5.70 per HIVST kit distributed, with test kits and personnel the main contributing costs. The SOC costed $263 400 or $4.57 per person tested. Individual-level provider costs were higher in the community-led HIVST arm than the SOC arm (adjusted mean difference $3.77, 95% CI $2.44 to $5.10; p<0.001), while the intervention effect on HIV positivity varied based on adjustment for previous diagnosis. The incremental cost per person tested HIV positive was $324 but increased to $1312 and $985 when adjusting for previously diagnosed self-testers or self-testers on treatment, respectively. Community-led HIVST demonstrated low probability of being cost-effective against plausible willingness-to-pay values, with HIV positivity a key determinant. CONCLUSION: Community-led HIVST can provide HIV testing at a low additional unit cost. However, adding community-led HIVST to the SOC was not likely to be cost-effective, especially in contexts with low prevalence of undiagnosed HIV. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03541382.



picture_as_pdf
Indravudh_etal_2021_Pragmatic-economic-evaluation-of-community.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: NC 3.0

View Download

Explore Further

Read more research from the creator(s):

Find work associated with the faculties and division(s):

Find work from this publication: