The effects on public health of climate change adaptation responses: a systematic review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries.

Pauline FD Scheelbeek ORCID logo; Alan D Dangour ORCID logo; Stephanie Jarmul; Grace Turner ORCID logo; Anne J Sietsma ORCID logo; Jan C Minx ORCID logo; Max Callaghan ORCID logo; Idowu Ajibade ORCID logo; Stephanie E Austin ORCID logo; Robbert Biesbroek ORCID logo; +19 more... Kathryn J Bowen ORCID logo; Tara Chen; Katy Davis ORCID logo; Tim Ensor ORCID logo; James D Ford ORCID logo; Eranga K Galappaththi ORCID logo; Elphin T Joe ORCID logo; Issah J Musah-Surugu ORCID logo; Gabriela Nagle Alverio ORCID logo; Patricia Nayna Schwerdtle ORCID logo; Pratik Pokharel ORCID logo; Eunice A Salubi ORCID logo; Giulia Scarpa ORCID logo; Alcade C Segnon ORCID logo; Mariella Siña; Sienna Templeman; Jiren Xu ORCID logo; Carol Zavaleta-Cortijo; Lea Berrang-Ford ORCID logo; (2021) The effects on public health of climate change adaptation responses: a systematic review of evidence from low- and middle-income countries. Environmental research letters, 16 (7). 073001-. ISSN 1748-9326 DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac092c
Copy

Climate change adaptation responses are being developed and delivered in many parts of the world in the absence of detailed knowledge of their effects on public health. Here we present the results of a systematic review of peer-reviewed literature reporting the effects on health of climate change adaptation responses in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The review used the 'Global Adaptation Mapping Initiative' database (comprising 1682 publications related to climate change adaptation responses) that was constructed through systematic literature searches in Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar (2013-2020). For this study, further screening was performed to identify studies from LMICs reporting the effects on human health of climate change adaptation responses. Studies were categorised by study design and data were extracted on geographic region, population under investigation, type of adaptation response and reported health effects. The review identified 99 studies (1117 reported outcomes), reporting evidence from 66 LMICs. Only two studies were ex ante formal evaluations of climate change adaptation responses. Papers reported adaptation responses related to flooding, rainfall, drought and extreme heat, predominantly through behaviour change, and infrastructural and technological improvements. Reported (direct and intermediate) health outcomes included reduction in infectious disease incidence, improved access to water/sanitation and improved food security. All-cause mortality was rarely reported, and no papers were identified reporting on maternal and child health. Reported maladaptations were predominantly related to widening of inequalities and unforeseen co-harms. Reporting and publication-bias seems likely with only 3.5% of all 1117 health outcomes reported to be negative. Our review identified some evidence that climate change adaptation responses may have benefits for human health but the overall paucity of evidence is concerning and represents a major missed opportunity for learning. There is an urgent need for greater focus on the funding, design, evaluation and standardised reporting of the effects on health of climate change adaptation responses to enable evidence-based policy action.


picture_as_pdf
Scheelbeek_2021_Environ._Res._Lett._16_073001.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: 3.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads