A risk assessment tool for resumption of research activities during the COVID-19 pandemic for field trials in low resource settings.

Suzanne M Simkovich ORCID logo; Lisa M Thompson; Maggie L Clark; Kalpana Balakrishnan; Alejandra Bussalleu; William Checkley; Thomas Clasen; Victor G Davila-Roman; Anaite Diaz-Artiga; Ephrem Dusabimana; +14 more... Lisa de Las Fuentes; Steven Harvey; Miles A Kirby; Amy Lovvorn; Eric D McCollum; Erick E Mollinedo; Jennifer L Peel; Ashlinn Quinn; Ghislaine Rosa ORCID logo; Lindsay J Underhill; Kendra N Williams; Bonnie N Young; Joshua Rosenthal; HAPIN Investigators; HAPIN Investigators; (2021) A risk assessment tool for resumption of research activities during the COVID-19 pandemic for field trials in low resource settings. BMC medical research methodology, 21 (1). 68-. ISSN 1471-2288 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01232-x
Copy

RATIONALE: The spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 has suspended many non-COVID-19 related research activities. Where restarting research activities is permitted, investigators need to evaluate the risks and benefits of resuming data collection and adapt procedures to minimize risk. OBJECTIVES: In the context of the multicountry Household Air Pollution Intervention (HAPIN) trial conducted in rural, low-resource settings, we developed a framework to assess the risk of each trial activity and to guide protective measures. Our goal is to maximize the integrity of reseach aims while minimizing infection risk based on the latest scientific understanding of the virus. METHODS: We drew on a combination of expert consultations, risk assessment frameworks, institutional guidance and literature to develop our framework. We then systematically graded clinical, behavioral, laboratory and field environmental health research activities in four countries for both adult and child subjects using this framework. National and local government recommendations provided the minimum safety guidelines for our work. RESULTS: Our framework assesses risk based on staff proximity to the participant, exposure time between staff and participants, and potential viral aerosolization while performing the activity. For each activity, one of four risk levels, from minimal to unacceptable, is assigned and guidance on protective measures is provided. Those activities that can potentially aerosolize the virus are deemed the highest risk. CONCLUSIONS: By applying a systematic, procedure-specific approach to risk assessment for each trial activity, we were able to protect our participants and research team and to uphold our ability to deliver on the research commitments we have made to our staff, participants, local communities, and funders. This framework can be tailored to other research studies conducted in similar settings during the current pandemic, as well as potential future outbreaks with similar transmission dynamics. The trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov NCT02944682 on October 26. 2016 .


picture_as_pdf
s12874-021-01232-x.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: 3.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads