The impact of stopping and starting indoor residual spraying on malaria burden in Uganda.

Jane FNamuganga; Adrienne Epstein ORCID logo; Joaniter INankabirwa; ArthurMpimbaza; MosesKiggundu; AsaduSserwanga; JamesKapisi; EmmanuelArinaitwe; SamuelGonahasa; JimmyOpigo; +10 more... ChrisEbong; Sarah G Staedke ORCID logo; JosephatShililu; MichaelOkia; DamianRutazaana; CatherineMaiteki-Sebuguzi; KassahunBelay; Moses RKamya; GrantDorsey; IsabelRodriguez-Barraquer; (2021) The impact of stopping and starting indoor residual spraying on malaria burden in Uganda. Nature communications, 12 (1). 2635-. ISSN 2041-1723 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-22896-5
Copy

The scale-up of malaria control efforts has led to marked reductions in malaria burden over the past twenty years, but progress has slowed. Implementation of indoor residual spraying (IRS) of insecticide, a proven vector control intervention, has been limited and difficult to sustain partly because questions remain on its added impact over widely accepted interventions such as bed nets. Using data from 14 enhanced surveillance health facilities in Uganda, a country with high bed net coverage yet high malaria burden, we estimate the impact of starting and stopping IRS on changes in malaria incidence. We show that stopping IRS was associated with a 5-fold increase in malaria incidence within 10 months, but reinstating IRS was associated with an over 5-fold decrease within 8 months. In areas where IRS was initiated and sustained, malaria incidence dropped by 85% after year 4. IRS could play a critical role in achieving global malaria targets, particularly in areas where progress has stalled.



picture_as_pdf
Namuganga_etal_2021_The-impact-of-stopping-and.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: 3.0

View Download

Explore Further

Read more research from the creator(s):

Find work associated with the faculties and division(s):

Find work from this publication: