The case for developing a cohesive systems approach to research across unhealthy commodity industries.

Cécile Knai ORCID logo; Mark Petticrew ORCID logo; Simon Capewell; Rebecca Cassidy; Jeff Collin; Steven Cummins ORCID logo; Elizabeth Eastmure; Patrick Fafard; Niamh Fitzgerald; Anna B Gilmore; +12 more... Ben Hawkins ORCID logo; Jørgen Dejgård Jensen; Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi; Nason Maani ORCID logo; Nicholas Mays ORCID logo; Modi Mwatsama; Rima Nakkash; Jim F Orford; Harry Rutter; Natalie Savona ORCID logo; May CI van Schalkwyk; Heide Weishaar; (2021) The case for developing a cohesive systems approach to research across unhealthy commodity industries. BMJ global health, 6 (2). e003543-e003543. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003543
Copy

OBJECTIVES: Most non-communicable diseases are preventable and largely driven by the consumption of harmful products, such as tobacco, alcohol, gambling and ultra-processed food and drink products, collectively termed unhealthy commodities. This paper explores the links between unhealthy commodity industries (UCIs), analyses the extent of alignment across their corporate political strategies, and proposes a cohesive systems approach to research across UCIs. METHODS: We held an expert consultation on analysing the involvement of UCIs in public health policy, conducted an analysis of business links across UCIs, and employed taxonomies of corporate political activity to collate, compare and illustrate strategies employed by the alcohol, ultra-processed food and drink products, tobacco and gambling industries. RESULTS: There are clear commonalities across UCIs' strategies in shaping evidence, employing narratives and framing techniques, constituency building and policy substitution. There is also consistent evidence of business links between UCIs, as well as complex relationships with government agencies, often allowing UCIs to engage in policy-making forums. This knowledge indicates that the role of all UCIs in public health policy would benefit from a common approach to analysis. This enables the development of a theoretical framework for understanding how UCIs influence the policy process. It highlights the need for a deeper and broader understanding of conflicts of interests and how to avoid them; and a broader conception of what constitutes strong evidence generated by a wider range of research types. CONCLUSION: UCIs employ shared strategies to shape public health policy, protecting business interests, and thereby contributing to the perpetuation of non-communicable diseases. A cohesive systems approach to research across UCIs is required to deepen shared understanding of this complex and interconnected area and also to inform a more effective and coherent response.


picture_as_pdf
Knai_etal_2021_The-case-for-developing-a.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: NC 3.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads