Epidemiological impact of prioritizing SARS-CoV-2 vaccination by antibody status: Mathematical modeling analyses

Houssein H Ayoub ORCID logo; Hiam Chemaitelly ORCID logo; Monia Makhoul ORCID logo; Zaina Al Kanaani ORCID logo; Einas AlKuwari; Adeel AButt; Peter Coyle ORCID logo; Andrew Jeremijenko ORCID logo; Anvar HassanKaleeckal; Ali NizarLatif; +10 more... Riyazuddin MohammadShaik; Hanan F AbdulRahim; Gheyath KNasrallah; Hadi MYassine; Mohamed G AlKuwari; Hamad Eid AlRomaihi; Mohamed HAl-Thani; RobertoBertollini; Abdullatif AlKhal; Laith J Abu Raddad ORCID logo; (2021) Epidemiological impact of prioritizing SARS-CoV-2 vaccination by antibody status: Mathematical modeling analyses. MedRxiv. DOI: 10.1101/2021.01.10.21249382
Copy

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have been developed, but their availability falls far short of global needs. This study aimed to investigate the impact of prioritizing available doses on the basis of recipient antibody status, that is by exposure status, using Qatar as an example.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Vaccination impact was assessed under different scale-up scenarios using a deterministic meta-population mathematical model describing SARS-CoV-2 transmission and disease progression in the presence of vaccination.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>For a vaccine that protects against infection with an efficacy of 95%, half as many vaccinations were needed to avert one infection, disease outcome, or death by prioritizing antibody-negative individuals for vaccination. Prioritization by antibody status reduced incidence at a faster rate and led to faster elimination of infection and return to normalcy. Further prioritization by age group amplified the gains of prioritization by antibody status. Gains from prioritization by antibody status were largest in settings where the proportion of the population already infected at the commencement of vaccination was 30-60%, which is perhaps where most countries will be by the time vaccination programs are up and running. For a vaccine that only protects against disease and not infection, vaccine impact was reduced by half, whether this impact was measured in terms of averted infections or disease outcomes, but the relative gains from using antibody status to prioritize vaccination recipients were similar.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Major health, societal, and economic gains can be achieved more quickly by prioritizing those who are antibody-negative while doses of the vaccine remain in short supply.</jats:p></jats:sec>



picture_as_pdf
2021.01.10.21249382v1.full.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: NC-ND 3.0

View Download

Explore Further

Read more research from the creator(s):

Find work associated with the faculties and division(s):

Find work associated with the research centre(s):

Find work from this publication: