Evaluation of public health interventions from a complex systems perspective: A research methods review.

Elizabeth McGill ORCID logo; Vanessa Er ORCID logo; TarraPenney; Matt Egan ORCID logo; MartinWhite; PetraMeier; MargaretWhitehead; Karen Lock ORCID logo; RachelAnderson de Cuevas; RichardSmith; +7 more... Natalie Savona ORCID logo; HarryRutter; Dalya Marks ORCID logo; Frankde Vocht; Steven Cummins ORCID logo; JenniePopay; Mark Petticrew ORCID logo; (2021) Evaluation of public health interventions from a complex systems perspective: A research methods review. Social Science & Medicine, 272. 113697-. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.113697
Copy

INTRODUCTION: Applying a complex systems perspective to public health evaluation may increase the relevance and strength of evidence to improve health and reduce health inequalities. In this review of methods, we aimed to: (i) classify and describe different complex systems methods in evaluation applied to public health; and (ii) examine the kinds of evaluative evidence generated by these different methods. METHODS: We adapted critical review methods to identify evaluations of public health interventions that used systems methods. We conducted expert consultation, searched electronic databases (Scopus, MEDLINE, Web of Science), and followed citations of relevant systematic reviews. Evaluations were included if they self-identified as using systems- or complexity-informed methods and if they evaluated existing or hypothetical public health interventions. Case studies were selected to illustrate different types of complex systems evaluation. FINDINGS: Seventy-four unique studies met our inclusion criteria. A framework was developed to map the included studies onto different stages of the evaluation process, which parallels the planning, delivery, assessment, and further delivery phases of the interventions they seek to inform; these stages include: 1) theorising; 2) prediction (simulation); 3) process evaluation; 4) impact evaluation; and 5) further prediction (simulation). Within this framework, we broadly categorised methodological approaches as mapping, modelling, network analysis and 'system framing' (the application of a complex systems perspective to a range of study designs). Studies frequently applied more than one type of systems method. CONCLUSIONS: A range of complex systems methods can be utilised, adapted, or combined to produce different types of evaluative evidence. Further methodological innovation in systems evaluation may generate stronger evidence to improve health and reduce health inequalities in our complex world.



picture_as_pdf
McGill_et_al_2021-Evaluation-of-public-health-interventions.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: NC-ND 3.0

View Download

Explore Further

Read more research from the creator(s):

Find work associated with the faculties and division(s):

Find work from this publication: