Human Health and the Social Cost of Carbon: A Primer and Call to Action.

Noah Scovronick; Valeri N Vasquez; Frank Errickson; Francis Dennig; Antonio Gasparrini ORCID logo; Shakoor Hajat ORCID logo; Dean Spears; Mark B Budolfson; (2019) Human Health and the Social Cost of Carbon: A Primer and Call to Action. EPIDEMIOLOGY, 30 (5). pp. 642-647. ISSN 1044-3983 DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001057
Copy

The health co-benefits of CO2 mitigation can provide a strong incentive for climate policy through reductions in air pollutant emissions that occur when targeting shared sources. However, reducing air pollutant emissions may also have an important co-harm, as the aerosols they form produce net cooling overall. Nevertheless, aerosol impacts have not been fully incorporated into cost-benefit modeling that estimates how much the world should optimally mitigate. Here we find that when both co-benefits and co-harms are taken fully into account, optimal climate policy results in immediate net benefits globally, overturning previous findings from cost-benefit models that omit these effects. The global health benefits from climate policy could reach trillions of dollars annually, but will importantly depend on the air quality policies that nations adopt independently of climate change. Depending on how society values better health, economically optimal levels of mitigation may be consistent with a target of 2?°C or lower.


picture_as_pdf
Scovronick_etal_2019_Human_health_and_the_social_cost_of_carbon.pdf
subject
Accepted Version
Available under Creative Commons: NC-ND 3.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads