How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing.

Katherine Pollard ORCID logo; Sue Horrocks; Lorna Duncan; Christina Petsoulas; Pauline Allen ORCID logo; Ailsa Cameron; Jane Cook; Emma Gibbard; Lizanne Harland; Pete Husband; +4 more... Geoff Loydon; Ruth McDonald; Lesley Wye; Chris Salisbury; (2019) How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 25 (3). pp. 142-150. ISSN 1355-8196 DOI: 10.1177/1355819619868506
Copy

OBJECTIVES: To establish how quality indicators used in English community nursing are selected and applied, and their perceived usefulness to service users, commissioners and service providers. METHODS: A qualitative multi-site case study was conducted with five commissioning organizations and their service providers. Participants included commissioners, provider organization managers, nurses and service users. RESULTS: Indicator selection and application often entail complex processes influenced by wider health system and cross-organizational factors. All participants felt that current indicators, while useful for accountability and management purposes, fail to reflect the true quality of community nursing care and may sometimes indirectly compromise care. CONCLUSIONS: Valuable resources may be better used for comprehensive system redesign, to ensure that patient, carer and nurse priorities are given equivalence with those of other stakeholders.


picture_as_pdf
1355819619868506.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: NC 3.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads