Core outcome measures for interventions to prevent or slow the progress of dementia for people living with mild to moderate dementia: Systematic review and consensus recommendations.

Lucy Webster ORCID logo; Derek Groskreutz; Anna Grinbergs-Saull; Rob Howard; John T O'Brien; Gail Mountain; Sube Banerjee ORCID logo; Bob Woods; Robert Perneczky; Louise Lafortune ORCID logo; +27 more... Charlotte Roberts ORCID logo; Jenny McCleery; James Pickett; Frances Bunn ORCID logo; David Challis; Georgina Charlesworth; Katie Featherstone; Chris Fox ORCID logo; Claire Goodman ORCID logo; Roy Jones; Sarah Lamb ORCID logo; Esme Moniz-Cook ORCID logo; Justine Schneider; Sasha Shepperd ORCID logo; Claire Surr ORCID logo; Jo Thompson-Coon; Clive Ballard; Carol Brayne ORCID logo; Alistair Burns; Linda Clare ORCID logo; Peter Garrard; Patrick Kehoe; Peter Passmore; Clive Holmes ORCID logo; Ian Maidment ORCID logo; Louise Robinson; Gill Livingston ORCID logo; (2017) Core outcome measures for interventions to prevent or slow the progress of dementia for people living with mild to moderate dementia: Systematic review and consensus recommendations. PloS one, 12 (6). e0179521-. ISSN 1932-6203 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179521
Copy

BACKGROUND: There are no disease-modifying treatments for dementia. There is also no consensus on disease modifying outcomes. We aimed to produce the first evidence-based consensus on core outcome measures for trials of disease modification in mild-to-moderate dementia. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We defined disease-modification interventions as those aiming to change the underlying pathology. We systematically searched electronic databases and previous systematic reviews for published and ongoing trials of disease-modifying treatments in mild-to-moderate dementia. We included 149/22,918 of the references found; with 81 outcome measures from 125 trials. Trials involved participants with Alzheimer's disease (AD) alone (n = 111), or AD and mild cognitive impairment (n = 8) and three vascular dementia. We divided outcomes by the domain measured (cognition, activities of daily living, biological markers, neuropsychiatric symptoms, quality of life, global). We calculated the number of trials and of participants using each outcome. We detailed psychometric properties of each outcome. We sought the views of people living with dementia and family carers in three cities through Alzheimer's society focus groups. Attendees at a consensus conference (experts in dementia research, disease-modification and harmonisation measures) decided on the core set of outcomes using these results. Recommended core outcomes were cognition as the fundamental deficit in dementia and to indicate disease modification, serial structural MRIs. Cognition should be measured by Mini Mental State Examination or Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale. MRIs would be optional for patients. We also made recommendations for measuring important, but non-core domains which may not change despite disease modification. LIMITATIONS: Most trials were about AD. Specific instruments may be superseded. We searched one database for psychometric properties. INTERPRETATION: This is the first review to identify the 81 outcome measures the research community uses for disease-modifying trials in mild-to-moderate dementia. Our recommendations will facilitate designing, comparing and meta-analysing disease modification trials in mild-to-moderate dementia, increasing their value. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO no. CRD42015027346.


picture_as_pdf
Webster-etal-2017-Core-outcome-measures-for-interventions-to-prevent-or-slow.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: 3.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads