Autonomy, accountability, and ambiguity in arm’s-length meta-governance: the case of NHS England

Jonathan Hammond ORCID logo; Ewen Speed ORCID logo; Pauline Allen ORCID logo; ImeldaMcDermott; Anna Coleman ORCID logo; Kath Checkland ORCID logo; (2018) Autonomy, accountability, and ambiguity in arm’s-length meta-governance: the case of NHS England. Public Management Review, 21 (8). pp. 1148-1169. ISSN 1461-667X DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1544660
Copy

Meta-governance involves orchestrating the ‘rules of the game’ in public management. Arm’s-length bodies are particularly important vehicles for this. We consider the case of an arm’s-length body (NHS England) created to oversee the English NHS’ day-to-day operation, and remove ‘political interference’. Although mandated by the Department of Health it has increasingly operated as policy-maker, developing policies in tension with existing legislation, while Ministers have faded from public-facing accounts of service operation. This suggests NHS England operates as a meta-governor, insulating government whilst pursuing its own agenda, and raises crucial questions about governmental accountability whilst simultaneously making answers harder to obtain.



picture_as_pdf
Hammond_etal_2018_Autonomy-accountability-and-ambiguity.pdf
subject
Accepted Version
Available under Creative Commons: NC-ND 3.0

View Download

Explore Further

Read more research from the creator(s):

Find work associated with the faculties and division(s):

Find work associated with the research centre(s):

Find work from this publication: