Long-term outcomes of second-line antiretroviral treatment in an adult and adolescent cohort in Myanmar.

Nang Thu Thu Kyaw ORCID logo; Ajay MVKumar; Myo Minn Oo ORCID logo; Htun NyuntOo; Khine Wut Yee Kyaw ORCID logo; Soe Thiha ORCID logo; Thet Ko Aung ORCID logo; ThanWin; Yin YinMon; Anthony DHarries; (2017) Long-term outcomes of second-line antiretroviral treatment in an adult and adolescent cohort in Myanmar. Global health action, 10 (1). 1290916-. ISSN 1654-9716 DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1290916
Copy

BACKGROUND: Myanmar has a high burden of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and second-line antiretroviral treatment (ART) has been available since 2008 in the public health sector. However, there have been no published data about the outcomes of such patients until now. OBJECTIVE: To assess the treatment and programmatic outcomes and factors associated with unfavorable outcomes (treatment failure, death and loss to follow-up from care) among people living with HIV (aged ≥ 10 years) receiving protease inhibitor-based second-line ART under the Integrated HIV Care Program in Myanmar between October 2008 and June 2015. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using routinely collected program data. RESULTS: Of 824 adults and adolescents on second-line ART, 52 patients received viral load testing and 19 patients were diagnosed with virological failure. However, their treatment was not modified. At the end of a total follow-up duration of 7 years, 88 (11%) patients died, 35 (4%) were lost to follow-up, 21 (2%) were transferred out to other health facilities and 680 (83%) were still under care. The incidence rate of unfavorable outcomes was 7.9 patients per 100 person years follow-up. Patients with a history of injecting drug use, with a history of lost to follow-up, with a higher baseline viral load and who had received didanosine and abacavir had a higher risk of unfavorable outcomes. Patients with higher baseline C4 counts, those having taken first-line ART at a private clinic, receiving ART at decentralized sites and taking zidovudine and lamivudine had a lower risk of unfavorable outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term outcomes of patients on second-line ART were relatively good in this cohort. Virological failure was relatively low, possibly because of lack of viral load testing. No patient who failed on second-line ART was switched to third-line treatment. The National HIV/AIDS Program should consider making routine viral load monitoring and third-line ART drugs available after a careful cost-benefit analysis.



picture_as_pdf
Long-term outcomes of second-line_GOLD VoR.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: 3.0

View Download

Explore Further

Find work associated with the faculties and division(s):

Find work from this publication:

Find other related resources: