Evaluating delivery systems: complex evaluations and plausibility inference.

Jayne Webster ORCID logo; Margaret Kweku; McDamien Dedzo; Kojo Tinkorang; Jane Bruce; Jo Lines ORCID logo; Daniel Chandramohan ORCID logo; Kara Hanson ORCID logo; (2010) Evaluating delivery systems: complex evaluations and plausibility inference. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 82 (4). pp. 672-677. ISSN 0002-9637 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0473
Copy

Delivery system evaluation is poorly defined and therefore a barrier to achieving increased coverage of interventions. We use a pre- and post-implementation cross-sectional observational study with assessment of the intermediate processes to evaluate a new delivery system for insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) in two regions of Ghana. In Volta Region, ownership of at least one net rose from 38.3% to 45.4% (P = 0.06), and 6.5% of respondents used a voucher in the purchase. In Eastern Region, ownership of a net rose from 13.7% to 26.0% (P < 0.001) and 0.5% of households used a voucher to purchase a net. Just 40.7% and 21.1% of eligible antenatal clinic (ANC) attendees were offered a voucher in Volta and Eastern Regions, respectively, and 36.0% and 30.7% used their voucher in the purchase of an ITN. Without attributing nets to the specific delivery system, in Eastern Region the success of the new system would be overestimated.


picture_as_pdf
Evaluating Delivery Systems_GOLD VoR.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: NC-ND 3.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads