External Validity of Contingent Valuation: Comparing Hypothetical and Actual Payments.

M Ryan; E Mentzakis; S Jareinpituk; J Cairns; (2016) External Validity of Contingent Valuation: Comparing Hypothetical and Actual Payments. Health economics. ISSN 1057-9230 DOI: 10.1002/hec.3436
Copy

Whilst contingent valuation is increasingly used in economics to value benefits, questions remain concerning its external validity that is do hypothetical responses match actual responses? We present results from the first within sample field test. Whilst Hypothetical No is always an Actual No, Hypothetical Yes exceed Actual Yes responses. A constant rate of response reversals across bids/prices could suggest theoretically consistent option value responses. Certainty calibrations (verbal and numerical response scales) minimise hypothetical-actual discrepancies offering a useful solution. Helping respondents resolve uncertainty may reduce the discrepancy between hypothetical and actual payments and thus lead to more accurate policy recommendations. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


description
HEL-ExternalValidity-revised-submitted.docx
subject
Accepted Version
Available under Creative Commons: NC-ND 3.0

Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads