Clinical Validation of a Smartphone-Based Adapter for Optic Disc Imaging in Kenya.

Andrew Bastawrous ORCID logo; Mario Ettore Giardini; Nigel M Bolster; Tunde Peto; Nisha Shah; Iain AT Livingstone; Helen A Weiss ORCID logo; Sen Hu; Hillary Rono ORCID logo; Hannah Kuper ORCID logo; +1 more... Matthew Burton ORCID logo; (2016) Clinical Validation of a Smartphone-Based Adapter for Optic Disc Imaging in Kenya. JAMA ophthalmology, 134 (2). pp. 151-158. ISSN 2168-6165 DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2015.4625
Copy

IMPORTANCE: Visualization and interpretation of the optic nerve and retina are essential parts of most physical examinations. OBJECTIVE: To design and validate a smartphone-based retinal adapter enabling image capture and remote grading of the retina. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This validation study compared the grading of optic nerves from smartphone images with those of a digital retinal camera. Both image sets were independently graded at Moorfields Eye Hospital Reading Centre. Nested within the 6-year follow-up (January 7, 2013, to March 12, 2014) of the Nakuru Eye Disease Cohort in Kenya, 1460 adults (2920 eyes) 55 years and older were recruited consecutively from the study. A subset of 100 optic disc images from both methods were further used to validate a grading app for the optic nerves. Data analysis was performed April 7 to April 12, 2015. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Vertical cup-disc ratio for each test was compared in terms of agreement (Bland-Altman and weighted κ) and test-retest variability. RESULTS: A total of 2152 optic nerve images were available from both methods (also 371 from the reference camera but not the smartphone, 170 from the smartphone but not the reference camera, and 227 from neither the reference camera nor the smartphone). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean difference of 0.02 (95% CI, -0.21 to 0.17) and a weighted κ coefficient of 0.69 (excellent agreement). The grades of an experienced retinal photographer were compared with those of a lay photographer (no health care experience before the study), and no observable difference in image acquisition quality was found. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Nonclinical photographers using the low-cost smartphone adapter were able to acquire optic nerve images at a standard that enabled independent remote grading of the images comparable to those acquired using a desktop retinal camera operated by an ophthalmic assistant. The potential for task shifting and the detection of avoidable causes of blindness in the most at-risk communities makes this an attractive public health intervention.


description
Clinical Validation of Smartphone Based Adapter Peek Retina for Optic Disc Imaging in Kenya_CLEANED V1.1.docx
subject
Accepted Version
Available under Creative Commons: NC-ND 3.0

Download

Accepted Version


Accepted Version


Accepted Version


Accepted Version


Accepted Version


Accepted Version


Accepted Version


Accepted Version


Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads