Job strain and tobacco smoking: an individual-participant data meta-analysis of 166,130 adults in 15 European studies.

Katriina Heikkilä; Solja T Nyberg; Eleonor I Fransson; Lars Alfredsson; Dirk De Bacquer; Jakob B Bjorner; Sébastien Bonenfant; Marianne Borritz; Hermann Burr; Els Clays; +40 more... Annalisa Casini; Nico Dragano; Raimund Erbel; Goedele A Geuskens; Marcel Goldberg; Wendela E Hooftman; Irene L Houtman; Matti Joensuu; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; France Kittel; Anders Knutsson; Markku Koskenvuo; Aki Koskinen; Anne Kouvonen; Constanze Leineweber; Thorsten Lunau; Ida EH Madsen; Linda L Magnusson Hanson; Michael G Marmot; Martin L Nielsen; Maria Nordin; Jaana Pentti; Paula Salo; Reiner Rugulies; Andrew Steptoe; Johannes Siegrist; Sakari Suominen; Jussi Vahtera; Marianna Virtanen; Ari Väänänen; Peter Westerholm; Hugo Westerlund; Marie Zins; Töres Theorell; Mark Hamer; Jane E Ferrie; Archana Singh-Manoux; G David Batty; Mika Kivimäki; IPD-Work Consortium; (2012) Job strain and tobacco smoking: an individual-participant data meta-analysis of 166,130 adults in 15 European studies. PloS one, 7 (7). e35463-. ISSN 1932-6203 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035463
Copy

BACKGROUND: Tobacco smoking is a major contributor to the public health burden and healthcare costs worldwide, but the determinants of smoking behaviours are poorly understood. We conducted a large individual-participant meta-analysis to examine the extent to which work-related stress, operationalised as job strain, is associated with tobacco smoking in working adults. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We analysed cross-sectional data from 15 European studies comprising 166,130 participants. Longitudinal data from six studies were used. Job strain and smoking were self-reported. Smoking was harmonised into three categories never, ex- and current. We modelled the cross-sectional associations using logistic regression and the results pooled in random effects meta-analyses. Mixed effects logistic regression was used to examine longitudinal associations. Of the 166,130 participants, 17% reported job strain, 42% were never smokers, 33% ex-smokers and 25% current smokers. In the analyses of the cross-sectional data, current smokers had higher odds of job strain than never-smokers (age, sex and socioeconomic position-adjusted odds ratio: 1.11, 95% confidence interval: 1.03, 1.18). Current smokers with job strain smoked, on average, three cigarettes per week more than current smokers without job strain. In the analyses of longitudinal data (1 to 9 years of follow-up), there was no clear evidence for longitudinal associations between job strain and taking up or quitting smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that smokers are slightly more likely than non-smokers to report work-related stress. In addition, smokers who reported work stress smoked, on average, slightly more cigarettes than stress-free smokers.


picture_as_pdf
pone.0035463.pdf
subject
Published Version
Available under Creative Commons: 3.0

View Download

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads