Efficacy of different pneumococcal conjugate vaccine schedules against pneumonia, hospitalisation, and mortality: re-analysis of a randomised trial in the Gambia.

Grant A Mackenzie ORCID logo; Christian Bottomley ORCID logo; Albert J van Hoek; David Jeffries ORCID logo; Martin Ota; Syed MA Zaman; Brian Greenwood ORCID logo; Felicity Cutts; (2014) Efficacy of different pneumococcal conjugate vaccine schedules against pneumonia, hospitalisation, and mortality: re-analysis of a randomised trial in the Gambia. Vaccine, 32 (21). pp. 2493-2500. ISSN 0264-410X DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.081
Copy

BACKGROUND: Pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCV) reduce disease due to Streptococcus pneumoniae. We aimed to determine the efficacy of different PCV schedules in Gambian children. METHODS: We reanalysed data from a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Infants aged 6-51 weeks were allocated to three doses of nine-valent PCV (n=8718) or placebo (n=8719) and followed until age 30 months. We categorised participants to compare: (a) a first dose at age 6 or 10 weeks, (b) intervals of 1 or 2 months between doses, and (c) different intervals between second and third doses. The primary endpoint was first episode of radiologic pneumonia; other endpoints were hospitalisation and mortality. Using the placebo group as the reference population, Poisson regression models were used with follow-up after the first dose to estimate the efficacy of each schedule and from age 6 weeks to estimate the incidence rate difference between schedules. RESULTS: Predicted efficacy in the groups aged 6 weeks (n=2467, 154 events) or 10 weeks (n=2420, 106 events) at first dose against radiologic pneumonia were 32% (95% CI 19-43%) and 33% (95% CI 21-44%), against hospitalisation 14% (95% CI 3-23%) and 17% (95% CI 7-26%), and against mortality 17% (95% CI -3 to 33%) and 16% (95% CI -3 to 32%) respectively. Predicted efficacy in the groups with intervals of 1 month (n=2701, 133 events) or 2 months (n=1351, 58 events) between doses against radiologic pneumonia were 33% (95% CI 20-44%) and 36% (95% CI 24-46%), against hospitalisation 15% (95% CI 5-24%) and 18% (95% CI 8-27%), and against mortality 17% (95% CI -2 to 33%) and 13% (95% CI -8 to 29%) respectively. Efficacy did not differ by interval between second and third doses, nor did the incidence rate difference between schedules. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence that efficacy or effectiveness of PCV9 differed when doses were given with modest variability around the scheduled ages or intervals between doses.

Full text not available from this repository.

Atom BibTeX OpenURL ContextObject in Span Multiline CSV OpenURL ContextObject Dublin Core Dublin Core MPEG-21 DIDL EndNote HTML Citation JSON MARC (ASCII) MARC (ISO 2709) METS MODS RDF+N3 RDF+N-Triples RDF+XML RIOXX2 XML Reference Manager Refer Simple Metadata ASCII Citation EP3 XML
Export

Downloads